<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Brad King <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brad.king@kitware.com">brad.king@kitware.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">Sagrailo wrote:<br>
> Is there any particular reason why the release of this project cannot be<br>
> made from back in 2004?<br>
<br>
</div>No, we simply have not gotten around to doing one. Releases are time<br>
consuming.</blockquote><div><br>I understand; please at least count a vote for have a release sometimes: it is easier indeed to create a package when official tarball is available for download, and then there are other advantages from the user point of view, for example CVS serving is rather slow - it took me more than hour to get the whole gccxml tree from the CVS last evening, while when I created tarball it was ~17MB, which I would have downloaded in couple minutes if served through HTTP, FTP or something alike...<br>
<br>Related question: is there a chance to have gccxml merged into the gcc source tree (as some kind of back-end, I guess) at some point?<br><br>Thanks.<br></div></div><br></div>