[GCC-XML] Function bodies

[Balasubramanyam, Shivakumar]

I agree. I would certainly be interested in looking at the code.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: gccxml-bounces+sbalasub=qualcomm.com at gccxml.org [mailto:gccxml-
>bounces+sbalasub=qualcomm.com at gccxml.org] On Behalf Of Roman Yakovenko
>Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:53 AM
>To: Daniel J. Lauk
>Cc: gccxml at gccxml.org
>Subject: Re: [GCC-XML] Function bodies
>
>On 6/28/06, Daniel J. Lauk <dj at djlauk.de> wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Well... I did some work on this because of my graduation thesis. What
I
>> developed so far is an (almost) 1-to-1 dump of GCC's syntax/code
tree.
>>
>> Because licensing might be an issue and because I got a job right
after
>> graduation ( :-) ) I did not publish my code, yet.
>>
>> I think it would be most benefitial if it was refactored in such a
way
>that
>> the structure would be the equivalent of C(++) syntax. I did not
complete
>on
>> this because I did not have the C++ syntax available and it wasn't
>necessary
>> for my thesis (and time's always short on thesises ;-) ).
>>
>> So, let me know if you still need the code and would like to work on
it.
>
>It could be nice if you can publish the code. Users will decide
>whether they can use
>the code or not, but at least the functionality will be available.
>
>--
>Roman Yakovenko
>C++ Python language binding
>http://www.language-binding.net/
>_______________________________________________
>gccxml mailing list
>gccxml at gccxml.org
>http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml