[GCC-XML] small template handling improvment

Roman Yakovenko roman.yakovenko at gmail.com
Wed May 10 10:21:55 EDT 2006

On 5/10/06, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> I don't think there is anything that can be done about this.  The
> mangled names do not need to contain anything about return types because
> those types are not necessarily used in overloading.  The return type
> can still be recovered from the "returns" attribute.

I want to understand when return type is mangled and when not. It will help.
Does somebody know?

> > Is it possible to apply the patch?
> Yes:
> /cvsroot/GCC_XML/gccxml/GCC_XML/xml.c,v  <--  xml.c
> new revision: 1.112; previous revision: 1.111
> -Brad

It was very quick, thanks

Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding

More information about the gccxml mailing list