[GCC-XML] small template handling improvment

[Roman Yakovenko]

On 5/10/06, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> I don't think there is anything that can be done about this.  The
> mangled names do not need to contain anything about return types because
> those types are not necessarily used in overloading.  The return type
> can still be recovered from the "returns" attribute.

I want to understand when return type is mangled and when not. It will help.
Does somebody know?

> > Is it possible to apply the patch?
>
> Yes:
>
> /cvsroot/GCC_XML/gccxml/GCC_XML/xml.c,v  <--  xml.c
> new revision: 1.112; previous revision: 1.111
>
> -Brad

It was very quick, thanks

--
Roman Yakovenko
C++ Python language binding
http://www.language-binding.net/