[GCC-XML] small template handling improvment
roman.yakovenko at gmail.com
Wed May 10 10:21:55 EDT 2006
On 5/10/06, Brad King <brad.king at kitware.com> wrote:
> I don't think there is anything that can be done about this. The
> mangled names do not need to contain anything about return types because
> those types are not necessarily used in overloading. The return type
> can still be recovered from the "returns" attribute.
I want to understand when return type is mangled and when not. It will help.
Does somebody know?
> > Is it possible to apply the patch?
> /cvsroot/GCC_XML/gccxml/GCC_XML/xml.c,v <-- xml.c
> new revision: 1.112; previous revision: 1.111
It was very quick, thanks
C++ Python language binding
More information about the gccxml