[GCC-XML] Why are C++ function bodies not dumped in XML?

[Karthikeyan M]

Hi ,

I have modified of gcc to output XML equivalent of a program's GIMPLE IR.

I am also interested in knowing some of the things Alan is looking for :

best practices, naming conventions for the XML output, policy on use
of elements vs. attributes etc

Regards,

Karthiik


On 10/11/07, Alan Conway <aconway at redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm interested in getting hold of a C++ parser to analyse the use of
> types and #include statements in C++, I'd hoped gccxml was it but then
> stubbed my toe on the fact that types used inside functions aren't
> dumped.
>
> I'd be interested in adding that if I can find the time. Can anyone give
> me some pointers as to where I would need to make changes? Also any tips
> on best practices, naming conventions for the XML output, policy on use
> of elements vs. attributes etc. would be most appreciated.
>
> No promises I'll every actually do anything but I've already scripted up
> half of the analysis based on gccxml output so I'm somewhat motivated to
> finish the job.
>
> Cheers,
> Alan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gccxml mailing list
> gccxml at gccxml.org
> http://www.gccxml.org/mailman/listinfo/gccxml
>


-- 

Karthik

****************************************************************************
To laugh often and love much; to win the respect of intelligent
persons and the affection of children; to earn the approbation of
honest critics; to appreciate beauty; to give of one's self; to leave
the world a bit better, whether by a healthy child, a garden patch or
a redeemed social condition; to have played and laughed with
enthusiasm and sung with exultation; to know even one life has
breathed easier because you have lived--that is to have succeeded.
--Ralph Waldo Emerson
****************************************************************************