[GCC-XML] Default parameter values in member functions of templated classes.
Brad King
brad.king at kitware.com
Tue Feb 26 08:59:53 EST 2008
Roman Yakovenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Bryan Ischo <bji-gccxml at ischo.com> wrote:
>> Can you elaborate on the other limits in the expression-to-string
>> conversion that people have encountered? It would help me to know about
>> these things instead of discovering them later on myself.
>>
>> As to the utility of correct default attributes - I had wanted to use
>> the text in the default attribute directly in generated C++ code, but it
>> wasn't working for defaults like the problematic one I wrote about. So
>> I scrapped that, and instead just give the user the text string of the
>> default value to do with what they will. It's just for completeness of
>> my API (the xrtti "extended runtime typing for C++" system) that I want
>> to be able to provide programmatic representations of the defaults to
>> the API users, not because I have any particular use case in which valid
>> default values would be useful. Perhaps I should submit a feature
>> request in the gccxml bug database for better expression-to-string
>> handling, especially with regards to default values?
>
>>From my experience only "very simple" default value expressions work.
> "Very simple" defined as POD, default constructor of non template class.
Roman is correct. The default argument attribute is intended mostly for
human reference and possibly documentation generation. Implementing
full support for default arguments would require full expression
dumping, which then gets most of the way to function body support. It
is non-trivial and was not a design goal of gccxml.
You don't actually need the default arguments to generate bindings.
Just generate one binding for each function signature:
void f(int, int = 1);
gets wrapped with two interfaces. Something like this:
if(num_args == 1)
{
f(convert_argument<int>(args[0]));
}
else if(num_args == 2)
{
f(convert_argument<int>(args[0]), convert_argument<int>(args[1]));
}
Then just include in the generated interface documentation that f()'s
second argument is optional and the default value is "<default-string>".
-Brad
More information about the gccxml
mailing list